.
Please use the Rubrics below as a guide for your ACTION PLAN
Please use the Rubrics below as a guide for your ACTION PLAN
and TAKE ACTION objectives
Evaluation Rubric (Year 5/6) Progress Presentations Week 6
Group names: ______________________________________________________
ACTION PLAN | 1-2 | 3-5 | 6-8 | 9-10 |
Individual Roles | Students have struggled to understand concept of applying roles to group members | Roles have been assigned to some group members but not distributed responsibilities equally or provided adequate reasoning | Roles have been assigned to each group member with reasonably distributed responsibility and some reasoning provided | Roles have been assigned to each group member with equally distributed responsibility and justified reasoning provided |
Global Issue | Global issue is not clearly evident. Hardly any resources and research were utilised. | Global issue is evident but group members are not clear about what it means. Very little research and resources were utilised. | Global issue is well researched and presented. A range of resources were used but not to a detailed level. Issue relates well to the action plan | Global issue is clearly addressed in poster format including Statistics, locations, maps and images. Issue relates specifically to the Action Plan |
Action Plain Details | There are little details provided about plan and not much thought is evident about plan of action | Some details provided, although plan is a little unclear as what action is to be taken relating to the chosen issue | Plan is well structured but details could be developed further – some relevant details like timing and location given | Plan details are well thought out with consideration given to relevant issue, timing, resources, location, support (if required) |
Progress Report details | Students show little or no evidence of a mission statement or resources used relating to the Action Plan or Global Issue | Students struggle to provide a structured mission statement but show some evidence of resources used in their action plan | Students provide a structured mission statement and show evidence of several resources used in their action plan development | Students provide an inspiring mission statement. Clear evidence shown that a wide range of resources, relevant to the Action Plan have been used. |
Organisation of Presentation | The presentation shows little organisation. There was problems with clarity and timing of the presentation | The presentation shows some sense of organisation. There was some issues with clarity or timing for the presentation | The presentation is organised. Good attempt to define headings. Most of the presentation clear and well timed | The presentation is well organised. With attention given to headings , clarity and timing of the presentation |
Feedback | Little or no feedback was requested or accepted from the class. No indication given that feedback will be used. | Minimal feedback requested/accepted from class. Little or no indication that feedback will be used in Action plan development | Some feedback is requested and accepted from the class. Only some indication is given as to how it may be used in taking action | Feedback is requested and accepted from the class. Indication is given as to how it may be used to improve the Group Action Plan |
Evaluation Rubric (Year 5/6) Take Action Presentations WEEK 10
Group names: ______________________________________________________
ACTION REPORT | 1-2 | 3-5 | 6-8 | 9-10 |
Creativity and Resources | Presentation demonstrates very little creative thought. Limited understanding. Limited variety of materials used. | Presentation shows some creative thought. It is not easy to understand. Some variety of materials used. | Presentation shows creative thinking and is easy to understand. A variety of materials used. | Presentation is creative, attractive, and easy to understand. An extensive variety of materials used. |
Presentation and Reflection | The presentation shows little organisation. Little reflection is made on the Action taken or learning. | The presentation shows some sense of organisation. Limited reflection is made on the Action taken or learning. | The presentation is organised. It includes details reflecting on the success of the Action taken and mentions learning. | The presentation is well organised. It includes many details reflecting on the success of the Action taken and shows evidence of learning. |
Class Engagement (students have to come up with 5min class activity) | Class activity had little structure or relevance to the group project | The activity was not thought through and the required materials and resources were not available. | The class activity was well thought through but the group needed to refine how they were going to take the lead. | Class activity was well structured, engaging and interactive. It greatly enhanced the class learning opportunity with this group project |
Knowledge Gained | Students attempt but have trouble answering questions about the issue explored and action taken | Students can briefly answer some questions about the issues explored and action taken, but they have trouble relating answers to their presentation. | Students can accurately answer questions about the issue explored and action taken and can make some connections with the presentation. | Students can accurately answer all questions about the issue explored and action taken and can make clear connections with the presentation. |
Addressing Feedback | Students have made little or no attempt to respond to feedback from the last presentation | Students took on one aspect of feedback form the last presentation but made minimal adjustments or improvements | Students incorporated some feedback from the last presentation and made some adjustments or improvements | Students have clearly responded to feedback from the last presentation and made relative adjustments or improvements |
Group Work | Group had difficulty working together with little focus on individual roles or responsibilities | Some of the group seemed to work well together but there was a lack of role definition and distribution of work load | Most of the group presented and worked well with an adequate distribution of roles and responsibilities | Group presented and worked well with equally distributed roles and responsibilities |
(click here to access RUBRIC in printable format)
